Management Of Change: Where Good Intentions Go To Die
Process Safety Fundamentals

Management Of Change: Where Good Intentions Go To Die

John Doe11 Jul 202621 min read

Almost every facility has an MOC procedure. Far fewer have one that's actually followed when the change feels small enough to skip the paperwork.

The 'Small Change' Trap

The changes that cause incidents are rarely the large, obviously reviewed ones — they're the substitutions, temporary fixes, and 'like-for-like' replacements that seem too minor to trigger a formal review.

A surprising number of serious incidents trace back to a change that technically should have gone through MOC but was judged, informally and incorrectly, not to need it.

Making MOC Something People Actually Use

MOC systems that are fast for genuinely low-risk changes and rigorous for genuinely high-risk ones tend to get used honestly; systems that treat every change identically train people to find workarounds.

The clearest sign an MOC program is failing isn't a lack of submissions — it's a suspiciously low rate of changes being flagged as anything other than routine.

Related Insights

Consultation background

Need Expert Engineering Support?

Partner with Mayford to strengthen safety, improve operational performance, and solve complex engineering challenges.